business models, progressive media

It’s not a silver bullet. It’s a stew.

1 Comment 25 August 2009Tracy Van Slyke

From Dave Cohn (@digidave), founder of Spot.us laying down the gauntlet that news orgs are going to have reconstruct their thinking about future sustainability:

Too often I think journalists or news organizations are looking for a silver bullet revenue stream.

Oh – if only we can charge for content behind a paywall (a bad idea as it cuts off other revenue streams).
Oh – if only we can get the Sandler family (or equivalent) to give 2 million a year to several organizations around the country.
Oh – if only advertising online would start to cover our traditional costs. (Advertising online will never meet the old print numbers)
Oh – if only we can get 100,000 people to donate $10 each. (Hey, I can pick on my model too!)

It ain’t gonna happen… Each of those revenue streams are logs. Some are sturdier than others. We need to figure out how to tie them all together.”

Agreed. It’s time to cook the perfect stew: a lot of ingredients, combined together to make a warm and filling winter food. Or in other words, a lot of different revenue generating options that work together to build on an organization’s strengths & that start filling in the gaps.

Of course–organizations aren’t going to know what the perfect recipe is off the bat. It’s going to take experimentation, or a lot of Julia Child like cooking. TMC is looking to support its members’ experimentation with revenue models next year to see what happen we collaboratively cook in our collective kitchen.

Bookmark and Share

impact, infrastructure, media politics, multiplatform, progressive media

Proposal: Model for Progressive Economic Reporting Timeline

No Comments 21 April 2009Tracy Van Slyke

picture-2Neiman Journalism Lab has a great post this a.m. in reaction to a new Google Lab release: a Google News timeline view,:

which gives users the ability to see and scroll through headlines, photos and news excerpts by day/week/month/year. The sources of this data can also be customized to include not just traditional news sources but also Wikipedia, sports scores, blogs, etc. It’s a fascinating way of interpreting the news — not something that is likely going to replace a regular old Google News headline view, but an additional way of looking at things.

One question kept nagging at me as I was looking at this latest Google effort at delivering the news, and that was: Why couldn’t a news organization have done this? (I’m not the only one to wonder this). Why not a newspaper, or even a collective like Associated Press (which seems to prefer threats to creativity)? Isn’t delivering the news in creative and interesting ways that appeal to readers what we are supposed to be doing?”

I had the EXACT SAME REACTION when I saw the Google Timeline yesterday. Progressive media peeps–it’s time to put the creativity hat on. So I have a proposal, something I’ve been thinking about for a while.

I think we should do a multimedia timeline of our collective economic coverage over the past 8 years–maybe focused on a single issue or two (i.e. predatory lending, Wall Street regulation) and input coverage from video, text, audio, blogs, reports, etc. from key progressive media sources. I think this effort could do a couple things:
a) Everyone keeps asking where the financial press was during this economic crisis. Well, the progressive media has been reporting furiously on the economic meltdown for years. Let’s show it. Let’s prove that what the “lefty” press was reporting and predicting came true.
b) We’re wondering how to tell this very complex and sprawling story to our audiences in a way that makes sense of the past and sets the stage for future reporting. A visual, searchable component that connects the reporting together into a larger narrative and makes it comprehensive for our audiences is a critical informative tool.
c) The opportunity factors: There’s an opportunity to start playing/integrating new storytelling and journalism formats. (We need to start figuring it out soon). This is an opportunity to leverage and utilize individual content into a collective, larger story and the opportunity to reach a potentially larger audience. And this could be an opportunity to have our audience be part of the creative process. Can our audience crowdsource to research, identify the reporting to go in the timeline?

What do you think of this idea? What would you add or argue with?

Bookmark and Share

Uncategorized, infrastructure, media politics, progressive media

The false left wing echo chamber

No Comments 17 March 2009Tracy Van Slyke

The right wing built up a powerful echo chamber over the last few decades.  In contrast, progressives have built dynamic networks of information and communication over the last few years.

The right wing built up a powerful echo chamber over the last few decades. In contrast, progressives have built dynamic networks of information and communication over the last few years.


Michael Calderone, Politico’s political media reporter (and whose blog I adore and read religiously) has veered off the track a bit with his latest piece: JournoList: Inside the echo chamber. As Calderone writes:

For the past two years, several hundred left-leaning bloggers, political reporters, magazine writers, policy wonks and academics have talked stories and compared notes in an off-the-record online meeting space called JournoList.

Proof of a vast liberal media conspiracy?

Not at all, says Ezra Klein, the 24-year-old American Prospect blogging wunderkind who formed JournoList in February 2007. “Basically,” he says, “it’s just a list where journalists and policy wonks can discuss issues freely.”

But some of the journalists who participate in the online discussion say — off the record, of course — that it has been a great help in their work. On the record, The New Yorker’s Jeffrey Toobin acknowledged that a Talk of the Town piece — he won’t say which one — got its start in part via a conversation on JournoList. And JLister Eric Alterman, The Nation writer and CUNY professor, said he’s seen discussions that start on the list seep into the world beyond.

Oh my god–Toobin used a conversation he was involved in as the genesis for a news piece? Stop the presses! Liberal Media Conspiracy Alert!

Seriously folks, how do you think half of journalism, reporting and analysis occurs? From conversations, information sharing, bouncing ideas off each, arguments and more. J-list is great for all those things. It’s not an “echo chamber.” No one on this list serve is telling anyone what to write about. No one is planning out how talking points are going to be distributed and bombard the public from all angles.

The list serve is just a small, small example of how today’s media system works. It’s a network. There are private and public networks forming, connecting, dissolving, and reforming every day. Some are sustained, others serve their purpose and disappear. It’s part of the media ecology that we now live in for people to connect, share, and discuss. It’s not a conspiracy, it’s human nature.

In this case, J-List is a private conversation among as diverse a group you can get of political journalists, professors and bloggers. And if I find them too inside-the-beltway one day, I turn to my other networks: Facebook, feminist list servs, and Twitter to get other perspectives and ideas. Progressives have been much more quick to adapt and integrate these different online networks into their daily lives, making it seem far less sinister than others would perceive them.

Calderone, of course, hits up the right for their take on J-list and gets a quote from “Michael Goldfarb, a former McCain staffer and conservative blogger.”

“There is nothing comparable on the right. E-mail conversations among bloggers, journalists and experts on our side tend to be ad hoc,” Goldfarb said. “The JournoList thing always struck me as a little creepy.”

Creepy?? The right created, built, and implemented the very definition of a political echo chamber over the last few decades. That’s creepy. Maybe the fact that they don’t talk to one another and share ideas is one of the major reasons the GOP is in a state of collapse. Maybe they should try it out. These are smart people, surely they can figure out how to set up a google group list serve, right?

Bookmark and Share

business models, impact, infrastructure, musings, progressive media

My feedback on MPA Magazines 24/7 Conference (Using Twitter Screen Shots)

No Comments 03 March 2009Tracy Van Slyke

I’ve been following the tweets coming out of @FishbowlNY as they faithfully cover MPA Magazines 24/7 Conference Fifth Digital Conference ‘Navigating a New Reality.’.

I’m posting some screen shots of their tweets, because, well, I can’t retweet them all!
picture-31

This sounds familiar. Sorta like what The Media Consortium is doing for its members?
Continue Reading

Bookmark and Share

Uncategorized, diversity, impact, infrastructure, media_politics, progressive media

Mapping (the influence of) the feminist blogosphere

1 Comment 06 February 2009Tracy Van Slyke

List of top 30 Feminist blogs, according to linkfluence

List of top 30 Feminist blogs, according to linkfluence

I (unfortunately) wasn’t at the Fem 2.0 conference, but I saw a recent post about the happenings over there. A really interesting group called Linkfluence (they visually mapped the sphere of influence of progressive and conservative blogs during the election) presented on the their visual map of the feminist web and made a list of the top 30 feminist blogs (according to their methodology).
Continue Reading

Bookmark and Share

impact, progressive media

The Young Turks Hit 50 million YouTube Views

1 Comment 20 November 2008Tracy Van Slyke

YouTube stats showing The Young Turks have hit 50 million views

YouTube stats showing The Young Turks have hit 50 million views


I wrote about how the political web talk show The Young Turks (also heard on Air America and XM radio) a while back, specifically noting how The Young Turks had successfully engaged “web soldiers” to promote and push out their content.

Now the news has come that the Turks have hit 50 million YouTube hits. From the press release.

With a staff of just five people, the progressive Young Turks Show has received almost twice as many views this election cycle as former presidential nominee John McCain’s YouTube channel (25.7 million) and half as many hits as President-Elect Barack Obama’s (113.6 million), which was run by an Internet staff of 95. The show’s explosive success is proof that progressives are mastering the web with numbers that make the die-hard-red talk radio world green with envy.

“We’re also one of the leading shows on XM satellite radio, but in politics the web is the future – the right just doesn’t get that.” said Young Turks founder and host Cenk Uygur, who lives in Los Angeles. “We are so proud of what we’ve built with The Young Turks and our audience is only growing as people increasingly turn to the Internet for news.”

Not too shabby. Not too shabby at all… That’s going in our book!

Bookmark and Share

conservative media, election, impact, media politics, progressive media

Queen Makers: The influence of the right wing media. (And how the progressive media compares.)

No Comments 31 October 2008Tracy Van Slyke

Amy Goodman had a great interview a few days ago with Jane Mayer, author of The New Yorker’s The Insiders: How John McCain came to pick Sarah Palin. . The transcript is up at AlterNet. Mayer traces the Palin promotion path–as the new Alaska Governor to the Republican Vice Presidential candidate. There’s a lot of interesting info in the article, but I wanted to pull out two main points.

1) The conservative media helped propel Palin into the national spotlight and basically land the V-P position. They were able to do this because they a) have a successful echochamber and b) their influence is so strong in the beltway, DC circles–the politicos listen to them. This is a stark contrast with the innerworkings and influence of the progressive media.

It all started out with the heads of the conservative media meeting Sarah in her own home in a sort of skewed version of “Who’s coming to lunch?”

The contingent featured three of The Weekly Standard ’s top writers: William Kristol, the magazine’s Washington-based editor, who is also an Op-Ed columnist for the Times and a regular commentator on “Fox News Sunday”; Fred Barnes, the magazine’s executive editor and the co-host of “The Beltway Boys,” a political talk show on Fox News; and Michael Gerson, the former chief speechwriter for President Bush and a Washington Post columnist.

This got the ball rolling and when the contingent headed back to D.C., the Palin praise train started rolling out of the station. Mayer notes that many of the lunch guests had become full blown cheerleaders.

The most ardent promoter, however, was Kristol, and his enthusiasm became the talk of Alaska’s political circles. According to Simpson, Senator Stevens told her that “Kristol was really pushing Palin” in Washington before McCain picked her. Indeed, as early as June 29th, two months before McCain chose her, Kristol predicted on “Fox News Sunday” that “McCain’s going to put Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, on the ticket.” He described her as “fantastic,” saying that she could go one-on-one against Obama in basketball, and possibly siphon off Hillary Clinton’s supporters. He pointed out that she was a “mother of five” and a reformer. “Go for the gold here with Sarah Palin,” he said. The moderator, Chris Wallace, finally had to ask Kristol, “Can we please get off Sarah Palin?”

The next day, however, Kristol was still talking about Palin on Fox. “She could be both an effective Vice-Presidential candidate and an effective President,” he said. “She’s young, energetic.”

But as Mayer noted in her article, by February 2008 the “the chorus of conservative pundits for Palin was loud enough for the mainstream media to take note. Chris Cillizza, reporting for the Web site of the Washington Post, interviewed Palin and asked her if she’d accept an offer to be McCain’s running mate.” Palin demurred at the time, but her star was on the rise. During the V-P selection process, McCain REALLY wanted his good buddy Joe Lieberman, but his political operatives gave him the big “talk to the hand,” noting Joe (the Senator) was too liberal on domestic issues and sent him in the direction of a little-known, arch conservative, charming woman from Alaska. And the rest is history.

I find this fascinating for a few reasons. One, I don’t know of any traditional progressive media outlets or individuals who from the ground up, will actively promote and then crown potential candidates in such a way. The progressive media speculates, bets and discusses to death the pros and cons of various candidate options. When they feel ready (and if they are able), they will endorse. The progressive blogosphere has actually started to fill this gap by actively promoting and raising funds for candidates across the country, but the influence beyond the chorus is unclear.

When you look at the sphere of influence that the conservative publications have within their own party and the mainstream media, it makes you stop for a second to ponder the potential. But maybe that’s the corrupting influence of power overtaking me. The most important take away for me is that the conservative media has made sure that the beltway establishment doesn’t ignore them (or can’t, even if they want to.) The progressive media is starting to move in that direction, but still has a long way to go to have the same level of influence.

2) The other major point of this article that really struck me was the efforts by one man–Adam Brickley and where he came from. Mayer tells Goodman that Brickley was one of the main individuals that lifted Palin up above the masses.

Brickley, who is just out of college, and he is a staunch conservative, he’s looking for somebody who could add some pep to the Republican ticket, and he particularly is worried about Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton as, you know, a possible combination. So, anyway, he’s looking for a female. And he starts with Wikipedia, and he just looks for all the females in the Republican Party. And he told — I interviewed him — he says at some point, you know, he couldn’t find anybody good, and then he thinks, oh, what about that lady that just got elected in Alaska? So he looks up things about Sarah Palin and sees that she’s considered kind of this rising star.

And so, he starts a blog that’s called Sarah Palin for Vice President Blog. And it starts pushing Palin and gets picked up by many other conservative blogs and then finally works its way into kind of conservative radio, Rush Limbaugh, and the American Spectator, conservative magazines. So there’s this sort of growing groundswell.

Ok-great. We’ve heard the story of the lone ranger become a powerful powerbroker in the blogosphere before. And we love it. But I find this nugget much more interesting.

Mayer says that Brickley has “gone to the Leadership Institute, which is an organization that Morton Blackwell, an evangelical Christian, founded a couple decades ago to train sort of cadres of the right wing…. He’s also received scholarships from various right-wing organizations. He currently is living in a dormitory that’s part of the Heritage Foundation here in Washington, which is another big right-wing think tank. You know, he’s been trained in how to kind of help the conservative movement and how to become part of it. So, he’s pushing Palin, and his blog gets a lot of traffic. And so, there’s kind of this nexus of these forces coming together, both of which are really Washington forces that are pushing Palin.”

The training of young, media savvy progressive political activists is in full swing, but we are still CLEARLY far behind them in the active caring and feeding of them. The conservatives give their young leaders a career path. We give them fits and starts. This is not a new or brilliant notion, it’s just one I wanted to reinforce.

All in all–I’m not interested in the progressive media becoming king or queen makers, but I am interested in determining the means and infrastructure for raising its influence among the individuals and groups that are. What are the first steps? It would actually be interesting to survey D.C. insiders to see what progressive media they consume and why. Who wants to work with me on that???

Bookmark and Share

Book, impact, musings, progressive media

Twittering Speech by Josh Marshall

No Comments 18 September 2008Tracy Van Slyke

Over the last few days I was at the Park Center for Independent Media’s inaugural symposium. It was great to hang, talk, learn from and gossip with some of my favorite independent media producers and thinkers. Josh Marshall of the illustrious Talking Points Memo (which will be spotlighted in our upcoming book) was the featured speaker yesterday evening. I twittered my way through the speech and thought it would be fun to share. Start from the bottom up.

Twitter of Josh Marshall\'s speech...

Twitter of Josh Marshall's speech...

(If you’re on twitter, check out tweets from @digidave and @AmandaRMichel on the speech as well.)

Bookmark and Share

business models, progressive media

Save Bitch!!

No Comments 16 September 2008Tracy Van Slyke

Bitch, one of my favorite all time feminist magazines, needs $40,000 to survive. Please donate, send around to people you know. I’m hitting the button to donate $100 right now.

The irony is that I’m sitting at the Park Center for Independent Media’s First symposium on The Future of Independent Media. The topic: Business, Revenue and Fundraising. The ongoing bane of our existence.

Bookmark and Share

impact, marketing, media politics, progressive media, web 2.0

Digg goes liberal? And how The Young Turks are creating “web soldiers”

1 Comment 05 September 2008Tracy Van Slyke


This
is an interesting article from MediaShift on digg’s evolution from a site mostly focused on technology stories to expanded issues, including their now most popular section–politics. The biggest complaint from some users is the liberal leanings of the posts (but maybe that just shows the organizing savvy and advanced use of technology by liberal media producers and their audiences? Hmmm?). Of course, there is also a nod to the tech-savvy of the “Ron Paulites.”

But the article also tells the story of AJ Wysocki, who was turned onto digg and social story sharing because of his affiliation to the liberal media outlet, The Young Turks. (Long quote from article, but I thought it was a great little case study. More below the excerpt…)

AJ Wysocki, 27, has only been a member and reader of Digg since June. He opened his account because a liberal political radio show he frequently listens to, The Young Turks, enlisted him as a “web soldier” and charged him with promoting the content of the show online.

“They were looking for people to do stuff on Digg and Facebook and MySpace,” he told me in a phone interview. “So I basically took Digg. What that meant is that every day I go on and submit video clips they do on Digg, and I also submit all the blog posts they write. That’s how I got started on the site really.”

Wysocki became a heavy listener of “The Young Turks” after the 2004 election; it was then that he grew increasingly interested in politics, and he followed the hosts as the program traveled from Sirius Satellite Radio to Air America and then later when it was dropped from the liberal radio network and became an independent entity. When they asked him to help them promote content on the social news site, he only had a vague idea of what it was.

“I’ve seen the little icon, because I read Huffington Post a lot, and I saw that little Digg icon but I never really looked at it,” Wysocki said. “And then I visited it and I thought this is a good idea because you can really build hype. If someone has an interesting story and you have enough friends to vote on it, it’s kind of like democracy. If you really like it then a lot of people see it and then it gets to the front page and a whole bunch more people see it.”

In the short time that he’s been a user of the site he has become a heavy reader, eventually expanding his submissions to include content not created by the Young Turks. In the process, a few of his submissions have ended up on the coveted front page.

Curious about how The Young Turks had engaged the young Wysocki to become their “web soldier”, I went on an investigation (i.e. visited their site) and saw that they had the specific link “Promote” that details out ways for their audience members to market and support the program through social networking and sharing. For example, they tell audience members what to do with Digg:

Digg our podcast and our video clips
Help get our podcast on the top of the news podcast page on Digg. Vote for our podcast on Digg here.
Don’t forget to Digg our daily clips, found on our Web site or YouTube.
Why stop at Digg? Don’t be shy. You can also support the show by ranking our clips, videos, and blogs through Google Trackback, Technorati Trackback, del.icio.us, and Reddit. So start clicking!

Now, for many of us in the media world, this is pretty elementary stuff. But how many of us explicitly ask and describe for our audience members how to share the info and what the result will be ? Most of us just have the little icons on the bottom of our posts. Maybe many of us think that our audience members already know what to do with these buttons and what the results will be, but if the story of A.J. is a good example, that’s clearly not the case. So the lesson is: If it seems so simple, it’s stupid to do–then it’s a probably a good idea.

So–oh yeah. If you’re reading–go digg this post! The little button is the first one on the left. And post to delicious and share on Facebook and, well… you get the point.

Bookmark and Share

On Twitter

© 2010 Beyond the Echo Chamber. Powered by Wordpress.

Daily Edition Theme by WooThemes - Premium Wordpress Themes